On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Sean Hefty <[email protected]> wrote: >>Sasha has written some comments on the general list indicating that >>libibcommon may disappear in the future. It could be combined with >>libibumad (as libibmad (and diags) both use it. > > I'd much rather see it integrated with libibmad than libibumad. libibumad is > fairly self-contained as the interface into the kernel.
That's fine as long as things that use libibumad don't now require libibmad as an additional dependency for something that was in libibcommon. I don't know if there's anything like that. xdump wouldn't cause that. I haven't looked at the rest of libibcommon and the implications. -- Hal > - Sean > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
