>@@ -595,21 +595,21 @@ typedef struct ib_vendor_call {
> #define MAD_DEF_RETRIES 3
> #define MAD_DEF_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
>
>-enum {
>+typedef enum {
> IB_DEST_LID,
> IB_DEST_DRPATH,
> IB_DEST_GUID,
> IB_DEST_DRSLID,
>-};
>+} mad_dest_t;
>
>-enum {
>+typedef enum {
> IB_NODE_CA = 1,
> IB_NODE_SWITCH,
> IB_NODE_ROUTER,
> NODE_RNIC,
>
> IB_NODE_MAX = NODE_RNIC
>-};
>+} mad_node_type_t;
For consistency, should these be named enums? (MAD_DEST and MAD_NODE_TYPE)
- Sean
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
