Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 16:32 Mon 26 Jan     , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote:
>>  rescan subnet configuration after SIGHUP
>>  call osm_subn_rescan_conf_files() after SIGHUP.
>>  this is important when priority is changed and SM is in standby.
>>  in that case it will not send capability mask trap and will not become 
>> master.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  opensm/opensm/main.c |    1 +
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/main.c b/opensm/opensm/main.c
>> index f786192..0f7b822 100644
>> --- a/opensm/opensm/main.c
>> +++ b/opensm/opensm/main.c
>> @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ int osm_manager_loop(osm_subn_opt_t * p_opt, 
>> osm_opensm_t * p_osm)
>>                      osm_hup_flag = 0;
>>                      /* a HUP signal should only start a new heavy sweep */
>>                      p_osm->subn.force_heavy_sweep = TRUE;
>> +                    osm_subn_rescan_conf_files(&p_osm->subn);
> 
> Is it synchronized with sweep? If regular (scheduled by timer) sweep
> starts in a middle of osm_subn_rescan_conf_files() (when QoS parameters
> are freed..., etc.). I think it is not.
> 
i assume it is not.
what about the the following (though it uses yet another flag...)

diff --git a/opensm/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h 
b/opensm/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h
index 8863e47..88c977d 100644
--- a/opensm/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h
+++ b/opensm/include/opensm/osm_subnet.h
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ typedef struct osm_subn_opt {
        uint32_t polling_retry_number;
        uint32_t max_msg_fifo_timeout;
        boolean_t force_heavy_sweep;
+       boolean_t rescan_conf_file;
        uint8_t log_flags;
        char *dump_files_dir;
        char *log_file;
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/main.c b/opensm/opensm/main.c
index de38056..f2d7846 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/main.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/main.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int osm_manager_loop(osm_subn_opt_t * p_opt, osm_opensm_t * 
p_osm)
                        osm_hup_flag = 0;
                        /* a HUP signal should only start a new heavy sweep */
                        p_osm->subn.force_heavy_sweep = TRUE;
-                       osm_subn_rescan_conf_files(&p_osm->subn);
+                       p_osm->subn.rescan_conf_file  = TRUE;
                        osm_opensm_sweep(p_osm);
                }
        }
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
index fc7ceb9..87a5db9 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
@@ -1042,6 +1042,13 @@ static void do_sweep(osm_sm_t * sm)
        ib_api_status_t status;
        osm_remote_sm_t *p_remote_sm;
 
+       if (sm->p_subn->rescan_conf_file) {
+               if (osm_subn_rescan_conf_files(sm->p_subn) < 0)
+                       OSM_LOG(sm->p_log, OSM_LOG_ERROR, "ERR 331A: "
+                               "osm_subn_rescan_conf_file failed\n");
+               sm->p_subn->rescan_conf_file = FALSE;
+       }
+
        if (sm->p_subn->sm_state != IB_SMINFO_STATE_MASTER &&
            sm->p_subn->sm_state != IB_SMINFO_STATE_DISCOVERING)
                return;
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to