Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 15:43 Tue 03 Feb , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote: >>> This probably can work with updn and minhops, but it certainly will be >>> destructive when LASH routing engine is used. LASH stores internal data >>> between sweep cycles, it is used to answer correct SL value in SA >>> PathRecord queries. So I think routing engine "switch" should be a bit >>> smarter. >>> >> that means that destroy and setup routing engine functions should be >> improved. >> what do you suggest in the meantime? > > I meant that instead of destroy/setup pair we need an update function > which will carefully compare a current routing engine list against > requested one and in any case will not destroy an routing engine(s) > which is in use.
so if we find the diff between the old routing engine and new one and use destroy to remove non used and setup for new engines - is it good enough? > >> limit this to minhop/updn? > > No. > > Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
