> -        type != IB_QPT_SMI && type != IB_QPT_GSI)
 > +        type != IB_QPT_SMI && type != IB_QPT_GSI && type != IB_QPT_RAW_ETY)

Seems we're at the point where mlx4 could use a "is_special_qpt()"
helper maybe?

 >              err = create_qp_common(dev, pd, init_attr, udata,
 >                                     dev->dev->caps.sqp_start +
 > -                                   (init_attr->qp_type == IB_QPT_SMI ? 0 : 
 > 2) +
 > +                                   (init_attr->qp_type == IB_QPT_RAW_ETY ? 
 > 4 :
 > +                                   (init_attr->qp_type == IB_QPT_SMI ? 0 : 
 > 2)) +
 >                                     init_attr->port_num - 1,

I think this is now way past the point where we should use a helper
function to compute this?

 > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ enum {
 >      MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG_IPOIB_CSUM    = 1 <<  7,
 >      MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG_BAD_PKEY_CNTR = 1 <<  8,
 >      MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG_BAD_QKEY_CNTR = 1 <<  9,
 > +    MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG_RAW_ETY       = 1 << 13,
 >      MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG_MEM_WINDOW    = 1 << 16,
 >      MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG_APM           = 1 << 17,
 >      MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG_ATOMIC        = 1 << 18,

probably nice to add this is dump_dev_cap_flags() so someone can check
dmesg output to see if raw ethertype is supported.

I don't see any changes to the poll cq side of things.  Is there
anything required to handle receiving raw ethertype datagrams?

 - R.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to