Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
This is with 634. It's pretty bad:
338316.44
329698.04
307972.7133
345682.4733
344165.08
Definitely, you suffer from the system "tiring" effect. So, to get
comparable results you should do measurements in a predefined state of
the system, for instance just after boot, and in a row, i.e. one
immediately after one.
I think you're right, that the system is getting "tired." I think I am
going to rest with the benchmarking for now though and just stick with
the latest code in trunk, noting that my "Test 4" reliably produces the
best results.
Cameron
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
