>The idea was to make sure that any formatting changes to the config file would >be consistent between opensm and the diags. So far this has not happened. >However, IMHO I think it would be a step backward to have the code in 2 >places.
I'm not sure we need to maintain duplicate code. I view that as a packaging issue. I.e. have a common directory that gets included by both packages. (I don't know how you'd actually do this, but I don't see why it can't work.) If we decide that, yeah, nodenamemap shouldn't be in complib, but there's not a reasonable alternative at this point, that's fine, but I at least want to see if there's something that can be done. - Sean _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
