I have a similar setup in datagram, and don't see a big difference.
Are these numbers expected? I guess I would like to understand the
limitations. It seams like these numbers are a bit below what the
hardware is capable of even with lro off.
-Ben
On Mar 9, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Boris Shpolyansky wrote:
I think for small MTU sizes you will see better performance with IPoIB
in datagram mode.
Boris Shpolyansky
Sr. Member of Technical Staff, Applications
Mellanox Technologies Inc.
350 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 100
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
Tel.: (408) 916 0014
Fax: (408) 585 0314
Cell: (408) 834 9365
www.mellanox.com
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Benjamin M.
McClelland
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ofa-general] ipoib performanec at smaller mtu
I was curious what other people are seeing for 1500 mtu performance on
ipoib. Current tests are showing that I get about 150-175MB/s no
matter
how many streams. If I go up to higher mtu, then performance
significantly increases. Due to the storage network that this ib is
routing to, we are currently limited to 1500 mtu.
ofed 1.4.1, connected mode, dual opteron dual core 1.8GHz, Mellanox
Technologies MT25418 [ConnectX IB DDR, PCIe 2.0 2.5GT/s] (rev a0) fw
2.6.000, voltaire sm on switch
lro disabled, send_queue_size=256
thanks,
-Ben
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
