Roland Dreier wrote:
wanted to apply this patch but it seems to be relative to some
intermediate state of your tree -- for example:
> @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static int __cxio_tpt_op(struct cxio_rdev *rdev_p, u32
reset_tpt_entry,
> u32 stag_idx;
> u32 wptr;
>
> - if (rdev_p->flags)
> + if (cxio_fatal_error(rdev_p))
> return -EIO;
where upstream doesn't have the rdev_p->flags test. please resend the full
patch.
It is on top of this series which is upstream somewhere:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/26/196
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
