Eli Cohen wrote: > ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc() called ipoib_neigh_free() from the first commit.
Okay, thanks for pointing this out. Looking on the code, I'm not sure why the non sucess/flush path of ipoib_cm_handle_tx_wc() must access the neighbour while ipoib_ib_handle_tx_wc can get a way with only a warning print... do we agree that accessing the neigbour from the cm tx completion flow is buggy? Or. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
