>Yes, it is different from GetTable in that SA pares the responses down >to that but Get doesn't (have that additional language to pare them >down).
This seems like an implementation issue (aka bug) with the SA to me. >The language about NumbPath for Get was originally added to indicate >that the NumbPath was ignored on a Get even if it was included in the >component mask. It states that it's ignored and a value of 1 is used. What else would a NumbPath value of 1 mean if it's completely ignored? I consider this a spec bug. :) >From an implementation view, requiring users to use SubnAdmGetTable to get a single path record is less efficient than returning a single PR from SubnAdmGet. How have other SM implementations (not based on opensm) interpreted NumbPath for PR SubnAdmGet? _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
