On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 11:36 +0300, Pavel Shamis (Pasha) wrote: > > I care about both. I care about the fact that a solid, well adhered to > > API makes for lots of happy MPI campers, not just one happy MPI camper. > > And the API road is the path to long term interoperability, not just > > short term. So if you really care about MPI, I would recommend you look > > to the long term, and you may find you agree with me then. > > > > > I agree here with Doug, API road is way to go. > But It is not reason to exclude MPIs from OFED. > OFED API issues maybe resolved even when > MPIs are part of package.
You're right, API issues *can* be resolved even if the latest MPIs are shipped with OFED. It's just that this hasn't been the case in the past, and throwing everything in the same bucket is a strong incentive not to worry about it in the future. -- Doug Ledford <[email protected]> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
