Hi Hal, On 11:53 Mon 06 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> @@ -1286,7 +1315,7 @@ uint8_t osm_get_lash_sl(osm_opensm_t * p_osm, const > >> osm_port_t * p_src_port, > >> > >> ?? ?? ?? src_id = get_lash_id(p_sw); > >> ?? ?? ?? if (src_id == dst_id) > >> - ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? return OSM_DEFAULT_SL; > >> + ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? return opt->lash_start_vl; > > > > Is this correct? As far as I understand this is SL for paths between > > CA ports connected to the same switch (which should be safe in sense of > > credit loops). Should lash be involved here? > > Is there a reason not to use the LASH SL for this ? I think it's more > in the spirit of LASH to do this.
OTOH it changes the default(current) behavior, and it would be nice to have a reason to do this. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
