On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Jason Gunthorpe<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 05:43:38PM -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> The proposed algorithm is less aggressive in terms of sending DR SMPs >> than the current one which seems to work well enough based on field >> experience. If the concern with this approach is breaking things over >> the current approach, I suppose a config variable could be added for > > No, it just wasn't clear to me what the substantive difference was > over the current approach. Reading your email made it seem like it was > more agressive not less.
Sorry for the confusion. The proposed algorithm is less aggressive as it limits things based on the max_smps_per_node which defaults to 4 whereas the current algorithm in the tree will send all blocks. > Anyhow, I had no particularly strong objection Glad to hear this. > just an observation that this could be done much better. > > Jason -- Hal _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
