Change force_single_heavy_sweep to force_heavy_sweep
Other cosmetic commentary changes

Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
index 4578ebc..4a6d0ff 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_trap_rcv.c
@@ -564,12 +564,12 @@ trap_rcv_process_request(IN osm_sm_t * sm,
 
        /* do a sweep if we received a trap */
        if (sm->p_subn->opt.sweep_on_trap) {
-               /* if this is trap number 128 or run_heavy_sweep is TRUE - 
update the
-                  force_single_heavy_sweep flag of the subnet.
-                  Sweep also on traps 144/145 - these traps signal a change of 
a certain
-                  port capability/system image guid.
-                  TODO: In the future we can change this to just getting 
PortInfo on
-                  this port instead of sweeping the entire subnet. */
+               /* if this is trap number 128 or run_heavy_sweep is TRUE -
+                  update the force_heavy_sweep flag of the subnet.
+                  Sweep also on traps 144/145 - these traps signal a change of 
+                  certain port capabilities/system image guid.
+                  TODO: In the future this can be changed to just getting
+                  PortInfo on this port instead of sweeping the entire subnet. 
*/
                if (ib_notice_is_generic(p_ntci) &&
                    (cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 128 ||
                     cl_ntoh16(p_ntci->g_or_v.generic.trap_num) == 144 ||
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to