On 11:16 Wed 22 Jul , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_mesh.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_mesh.c
> index 23fad87..dce2ea1 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_mesh.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_mesh.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,16 @@ typedef struct _mesh {
> int dim_order[MAX_DIMENSION];
> } mesh_t;
>
> +typedef struct sort_ctx {
> + lash_t *p_lash;
> + mesh_t *mesh;
> +} sort_ctx_t;
> +
> +typedef struct comp {
> + int index;
> + sort_ctx_t *ctx;
> +} comp_t;
And wouldn't it be simpler to use:
struct comp {
switch_t **s;
sort_ctx_t ctx;
};
? So you will have already sorted switches and only will need to care
about s->id and s->links fixing (and will not need switches[] array too).
Sasha
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
