On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 10:43 Wed 05 Aug , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > Should this be done as a separate step on the way to the LFT > parallelization > > across switches ? > > What do you mean by "separate step" (separate from what)? Separate patches: first to move the osm_ucast_mgr_set_fwd_table call up a level and a second one to the implement the LFT parallelization across switches underneath that. > > > I'm trying to replay the idea again: each routing engine calculates LFTs > and fill sw->new_lfts array accordingly, after all it calls a procedure > for sending switches' LFT blocks (and TOPs). So routing engine itself > should not care about how exactly LFT blocks update MADs submission is > actually implemented. > Yes, understood. -- Hal > > Sasha >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
