[ 
http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/PAXRUNNER-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_11091
 ] 

Alin Dreghiciu commented on PAXRUNNER-115:
------------------------------------------

Can be done. Actually this crossed my mind. But the bug in eclipse stuff is 
only related of having a version? Name does not matter? I could not see this 
from the bug of eclipse you posted as The link points to something that I 
cannot relate to this bug.

Anyhow, feel free to try that out.

> osgi.framework.extensions don't works on equinox
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PAXRUNNER-115
>                 URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/PAXRUNNER-115
>             Project: Pax Runner
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: platform equinox
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.0
>            Reporter: Damian Golda
>            Assignee: Alin Dreghiciu
>
> I have a bundle (from aspectj) which should be used as equinox extension.
> So I set system property osgi.framework.extensions to its symbolic name.
> This property appears in config.ini but bundle is not loaded as an extension.
> As I found at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Adaptor_Hooks:
> "Due to a bug (Bug 206611 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=206611 ), you must add the 
> version number as a suffix to the jar, like "jar.file_1.0.0.0.jar", 
> "jar.file.jar" won't be found!"
> But pax-runner generate (random?) number-based file-names for downloaded 
> bundles.
> I suggest to change pax-runner to name jars according to equinox convention, 
> that means {bundle symbolic name}_{version}.jar
> I think It would be more clear for persons looking into runner/bundle 
> directory.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to