Hello Peter, On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:10:17 +0200, "Peter Neubauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi there, when it comes to multiple configurations of the provisioning > part, I guess Maven profiles should help you there to specify > different PaxRunner etc arguments.
Ok, this could be an option. But there will be approximate over 10 different combinations. The resulting pom.xml will be huge. I would prefer a separate file for each combination. > Regarding different layout etc, I don't think anything prevents you > from having an Überpom.xml that points out the different PaxConstruct > projects (Common, A, B), and within A and B you can then reference > artifacts from Common. I think this could be a good solution and I will try it in the next step. At the moment I'm learning the standard pax-construct behaviour and I still have some problems with it. regards, Lars _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
