Thanks Peter,

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Peter Neubauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Ahh,
> now things are starting to work - very neat indeed! The current
> packaging with mvn install produces a .jar file, not sure if that is
> good, since it is not executable by java, so maybe .zip would be
> better?


I think that is right, a better artifact type would be .zip.

>
>
> With integration to PaxConstruct this would be really handy to package
> projects. Nice work!
>
> /peter
>

Today I will be  putting in my  plans/roadmap for it, so that I could get
ideas and support as early as possible.
(Ahh, its weekend, ... lots of time for OSS activity ...!)

>
> http://www.oredev.se - Be there or be gone.
>
> GTalk:        neubauer.peter
> Skype        peter.neubauer
> ICQ            18762544
> Phone       +46704 106975
> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>
> http://www.neo4j.org     - New Energy for Data - the Graph Database.
> http://www.ops4j.org     - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
> Participation Software.
> http://www.qi4j.org        - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven
> Development.
>

-- 
Thanks and Regards,

Thomas Joseph
------------------------------------------------------------
Promote Open Source - Promote Liberty of Ideas and Software.
------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to