Does this mean the maven project name will also be changed (again)?
org.ops4j.pax.web.service instead of org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-service
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/2/18 Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com>
Hi guys,
There is an issue related to Pax Web's bundle symbolic name and maven
artifact name: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-124
For those interested, please take a look and comment on the issue if
you fill like. I do not have an issue with changing the BSN to make
Buckminster but this could affect some people.
So, WDYT? Should we or should we not follow this pattern?
FWIW, I'm ok with changing it as long as we give people a head's up
( like this :)
( occasionally I do wonder about changing a bundle's symbolic name
at random
on each release, just to see if anyone is depending on it using
Require-Bundle! ;)
--
Alin Dreghiciu
http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open
Participation Software.
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development.
http://www.codedragons.com - New Energy for Projects - Great People
working on Great Projects at Great Places
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
--
Cheers, Stuart
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
