Solved. It was a bnd 0.0.313 regression related at the way instructions were accessed from Properties.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <adreghi...@gmail.com> wrote: > P.S. Just saw that we have a potential regression in our wrapping > support. Still the usage remain the same, just that the wrapping is > not correct in some cases as for the war: stuff. -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. Looking for a job. Sent from: Cluj-Napoca CJ Romania. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
