On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Johan Lindquist <jo...@kawoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I think we are somewhat worried about loosing too much time - and with > what we thought was a good name, we wanted to go with it. But do you > think it is then worth holding off choosing a name with the risk of > not getting something out there straight away? Apache is very sensitive to brand infringements, and getting "Cease & Desist" letters later is no fun (then you either fight it (a no no in Apache) or change name when it might be well known). So, try to pick names that avoid future trouble is good. A 'good name' is seldom a fact, and often a matter of "getting used to". Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
