On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Filippo Diotalevi < filippo.diotal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Toni Menzel<t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > > @Matthias, once the UserAdmin Implementation is usable to "some > > extend", don't hesitate to tell us about it, and start with > > documentation on the wiki. > > I think people here are kind enough to even help out.. > > The initial usable "case" + some "starting docs" are usually enough to > > continue work as an offical pax project (out of lab). > Yes I will - I just want to finish at least one StorageProvider implementation to have some proof-of-concept. Currently I'm fighting with an Ldap implementation - however, maybe I'll have to choose some simpler implementation first ;-) I agree! > I'm definitely interested in a user admin service implementation. > Filippo, do you have any storage technology in mind? Currently I thought it would be nice to have the following StorageProvider implementations: - Ldap (maybe via Spring LdapTemplate) - PreferencesService - file based? Any other ideas? Cheers, Matthias
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
