Hi, for me the merge of the branch was not as easy as expected, somehow tortoise-git showed me conflicts on almost every file and even worse on almost every file it showed me the full file as in conflict :( No much fun there, but probably a better client would help. BTW, the eclipse client doesn't help much either on this, but helped a lot on comparing the merged stuff with the original
2010/9/30 Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> > Yes, also take a note on some discussions from here: > > http://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/commit/327e4fd3917ecdf0e7ecdfb13e8e7176979c22c9#commitcomment-159100 > > I would agree on keeping those comment tight and brief, so the main > discussion go to the list. > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> > wrote: > > Yes, now the interesting workflow bits are starting... I'm curious. > > > > Cheers > > Niclas > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Achim has merged the work i've done on jetty7 into the websecureContext > >> branch. > >> I propose we merge that back into master and continue the work there. > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 21:07, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> It would be interesting to merge with my work on jetty7 then, because > all > >>> jetty7 jars are native osgi bundles. > >>> That would make things easier .... > >>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 21:05, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com > > > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> You are right about this, it was just the use case I was looking for > when > >>>> I added the issue in the first place. > >>>> I did some research about JAAS inside Jetty already, as far as I > >>>> understood, you need the jetty-plus jar also > >>>> to get JAAS-UserRealms (btw. UserRealm is the realm interface of > Jetty) > >>>> going within Jetty. I did take a look > >>>> at it, but the one I found wasn't "OSGi-fied" yet. > >>>> > >>>> I'll try to have a look at using JAAS, but the fact that it's running > on > >>>> top of Karaf should have no effect on JAAS at all. > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 23:07, Achim Nierbeck < > bcanh...@googlemail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I would say I'm at a good point right now. > >>>>> So feel free for a review. > >>>>> > >>>>> What I didn't achieve yet, is a way of connecting a JAAS Realm from > the > >>>>> Karaf Server. > >>>>> > >>>>> greetings, Achim > >>>>> > >>>>>> [ > >>>>>> > http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13547#action_13547 > >>>>>> ] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Achim Nierbeck commented on PAXWEB-210: > >>>>>> --------------------------------------- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sofar so good, > >>>>>> because of adding the improvement of PAXWEB-193 > >>>>>> I'm able to configure and use a jetty managed "UserRealm" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Security Constraints for WebApplications > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Key: PAXWEB-210 > >>>>>>> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-210 > >>>>>>> Project: Pax Web > >>>>>>> Issue Type: Improvement > >>>>>>> Components: War Extender, Web Container, Whiteboard > Extender > >>>>>>> Affects Versions: 0.7.1, 0.7.2 > >>>>>>> Reporter: Achim Nierbeck > >>>>>>> Assignee: Achim Nierbeck > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Currently it is not possible to configure a security-constraint for > >>>>>>> any kind of web application served by pax-web. > >>>>>>> Therefore no Authentication is possible with pax-web :( > >>>>>>> If I'm running pax-web with the Apache Karaf server there is even > an > >>>>>>> JAAS realm I would like to connect to. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> general mailing list > >>>>> general@lists.ops4j.org > >>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Guillaume Nodet > >>>> ------------------------ > >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >>>> ------------------------ > >>>> Open Source SOA > >>>> http://fusesource.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Cheers, > >>> Guillaume Nodet > >>> ------------------------ > >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >>> ------------------------ > >>> Open Source SOA > >>> http://fusesource.com > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> Guillaume Nodet > >> ------------------------ > >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >> ------------------------ > >> Open Source SOA > >> http://fusesource.com > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> general mailing list > >> general@lists.ops4j.org > >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > general@lists.ops4j.org > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > -- > Toni Menzel || http://okidokiteam.com > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
