I'm doing it right now, so if there's no objection to release pax-url, I can
cut a release today or tomorrow.

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:38, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> When do you like to implement the changes? I mean, after I've pushed the
> snapshots I can wait, but nevertheless I prefere minor frequent releases
> above
> huge and rare ones. I've no problem cutting another release (pax-web-0.8.1)
> in
> two or three weeks...
>
> kind regards
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:15:55AM +0200, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >    On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 05:20, Andreas Pieber <[1]anpie...@gmail.com>
> >    wrote:
> >
> >      hey,
> >      Its been a while since the last pax-web release and I think with the
> >      upgrade to
> >      jetty 7 it's time to do it again :) Nevertheless, it's my first
> >      release of a pax
> >      project so I share my ideas with you; feel free to correct me :)
> >      I've scanned the pax-web JIRA project for opened issues assigend to
> >      0.8.0 [1].
> >      There are 4 issues assigned for this release (opened for about a
> >      year now...).
> >      How should I proceed with them (I can't fix them in time and IMHO
> >      they're not
> >      critical for this release...). Should I assign them to 0.9.0 or
> >      simply to no
> >      direct milestone?
> >      Another question to all: Is there anything opened you really want to
> >      get into
> >      the 0.8er release?
> >
> >    Yes, but indirectly.
> >    I'd like to enhance pax-url war url handler to have a simple way to
> >    optional import the pax-logging exported packages, so that the logging
> >    in those apps would work by default when deployed with pax-logging
> >    already deployed.
> >    Those imports would be optional and use the provider=paxlogging
> >    attribute to ensure they're actaully wired to pax-logging.
> >    I'm not sure if this should be a default or based on a
> >    system/bundlecontext property yet.
> >    The reason i'm talking about that is that the features file contain a
> >    reference to pax-url, so i'd like to have it released before that.
> >
> >      Some questions:
> >      [2] Describes the release process of ops4j proejcts. The following
> >      point's I'm
> >      not sure about:
> >      *) [2] makes difference between releases <1.0 and >=1.0 Is this
> >      really of
> >      relevance? IMHO all artifacts should be located at mvn central,
> >      shouldn't they?
> >      *) A profile with staging and a profile with non-staging exists.
> >      What is the
> >      typical process at opsj: simply release (non-staging) and add new
> >      releases as
> >      problems with the current build occur or (staging) releases with a
> >      vote?
> >      *) access sonatype repos. I have a sonatype account already (pieber)
> >      for other
> >      projects, but I'm not sure if it does work for ops4j? Do you need to
> >      add me to
> >      some list to access the staging/release repos?
> >      kind regards,
> >      andreas
> >      [1]
> >      [2]
> http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mod
> >      e=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=101
> >      10&fixfor=10376
> >      [2] [3]http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Releasing
> >      _______________________________________________
> >      general mailing list
> >      [4]gene...@lists.ops4j.org
> >      [5]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> >    --
> >    Cheers,
> >    Guillaume Nodet
> >    ------------------------
> >    Blog: [6]http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >    ------------------------
> >    Open Source SOA
> >    [7]http://fusesource.com
> >
> > References
> >
> >    1. mailto:anpie...@gmail.com
> >    2.
> http://issues.ops4j.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10110&fixfor=10376
> >    3. http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Releasing
> >    4. mailto:general@lists.ops4j.org
> >    5. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >    6. http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >    7. http://fusesource.com/
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to