I submitted my patch to Git. I'm new to git and would appreciate it if someone could take a quick look and make sure I did it properly.
Thanks! Matt On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 23:39:24 +0100, Toni Menzel <t...@okidokiteam.com> wrote: > Does pax-url-aether not fit your needs? This is -once we can reduce the > dependency stack a bit more- the future. > I think when speaking of pax-url-maven you mean pax-url-mvn..? > On Dec 6, 2010 11:33 PM, "Matt Pavlovich" <m...@mediadriver.com> wrote: >> All- >> >> I'm working on a simple patch to not add the statically declared >> DEFAULT_REPOSITORIES (http://osgi.sonatype.org/content/groups/pax-runner) >> to the list of repositories used by pax-url-maven as long as a user has >> defined a repository in the external properties file, or specified maven >> settings.xml. This hopes to solve 2 issues. >> >> Issue 1. Users using software that uses pax-url-maven behind a proxy will >> experience weird issues. proxySupport is available as a configuration >> option, but it isn't well documented. >> >> Issue 2. Users cannot "lock down" the list of repositories and > dependencies >> that will be pulled in by pax-url-maven, because there is no way to > disable >> the DEFAULT_REPOSITORIES. >> >> I created a JIRA: >> JIRA: http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXURL-92 >> >> I'm planning on having this fix tested and updated this week, but it > brings >> up a bigger question about pax-url-maven configuration and behavior as a >> whole. I'd be interested in hearing feedback from the community, but here >> is what I am thinking: >> >> Proposal 1. Removal of FALLBACK_REPOSITORIES and DEFAULT_REPOSITORIES. >> This would clean up and simplify the configuration of pax-url-maven and >> rely on people shipping products that use pax-url-maven and end-users to >> have one and only one list of repositories. In my opinion, having the >> statically defined repositories unnecessarily complicates things. >> >> Proposal 2. Auto-detection of proxy support if a proxy is configured and >> active in a Maven settings.xml file. I can't think of a scenario where a >> user would configure Maven to use a proxy, and pax-url-maven would not >> use >> a proxy on the same box. >> >> Feedback greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> Matt Pavlovich >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> general@lists.ops4j.org >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
