On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:34:13AM +0800, Edward Yakop wrote: > Perhaps we should just concentrate the documentation in wiki.
Was also my thought. Let's see what the others think about this...
> In regards to upgrade,�
>
> I noticed that a clean up is required in service/osgi.bundle.
UPS :) Yes you're right. ${wicket.dependency.version} will do a better job here
I think...
>
> Export-Package: \
> � org.ops4j.pax.wicket.api;version="${pom.version}", \
> � org.ops4j.pax.wicket.util.*;version="${pom.version}", \
> � org.apache.wicket.*;version=1.4.10 # This should be 1.4.15
> And we need to check the src/main/resources/wicket.properties
> IIRC, I had to override the Initializer to combine all wicket
> initializer into a single class.
> Regards,
> Edward Yakop�
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:21, Andreas Pieber <[1][email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hey,
> At the moment I'm at upgrading all versions of pax-wicket, cleaning
> the project
> up, getting all my use cases to work, integrate pax-wicket better
> with karaf and
> get the project to m2central.
> One question regarding to documentation: Do we really want to split
> the documentation
> over multible site goals and the wiki? � IMHO we should either
> create a docs project
> containing all documentation (even in site format/docbkx) OR move
> all documentation
> to the wiki. What is the opinon of the
> long-time-pax-wicket-commiters to this point?
> Any other ideas from the community regarding this issue. That's one
> point I don't want
> to decide on my own...
> kind regards,
> andreas
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [2][email protected]
> [3]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[email protected]
> 2. mailto:[email protected]
> 3. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
pgpKAVR9XTlib.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
