On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote:
> One more thing; > Ceki actually realized the problem about API/SPI/Impl separation > (hopefully after discussing it with us on the Avalon project back in > 2004) and therefor we have SLF4J as a pure API, and LogBack as an > implementation of that. I have not checked, but I assume then that > LogBack has a nice SPI as well for extensions. Too bad that the > Logging community in Apache couldn't agree enough to bring Log4j 2.0 > to market with that vision, and instead Ceki left and created LogBack > independently. > Yeah it's double too-bad because I've been trying to follow Ceki with all his latest releases and haven't had the best of luck finding them in nice clean OSGI bundles that can be easily consumed from maven central. When I try to create my own OSGi bundles from what he has released, it keeps wanting to include a package from a previous bundle which seems to conflict somewhere once I try to include it, and I haven't budgeted enough time to disentangle thoughtfully. It would seem so much more logical to follow the latest cleaner Ceki releases than manage the more convoluted older logging versions, but if that was true I guess I'd do it eh?
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
