there is never a stupid question :) first of all I just think this is just a major step to go from 0.8.1 release to 1.0.0 which should be worth a M1 as a last Integration step to just make sure we do have all needed features and bugs fixed to really call it a 1.0.
Regarding your first answer, thank good I'm not at the point of promoting :) I read the documentation till the end :) So what would be a good place to put the key to? Thanks, Achim > ermm.. one stupid question maybe, because i did not really follow the > pax web development recently myself .. why is it a M1 release exactly > ? and not 0.9.9 or 1.0.0 ? Don't tell that its because Pax Exam > 2.0.0-M1 made an example .. ;) > > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > We are using the oss.sonatype.org <http://oss.sonatype.org> > system, which requires us to have the key available "somehwere". > Read > this: > http://www.sonatype.com/people/2010/01/how-to-generate-pgp-signatures-with-maven/ > -- snip -- > > > Distribute Your Public Key > > Since other people need your public key to verify your files, you > have to distribute your public key to a key server: > > gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu> --send-keys > C6EED57A > > Here I distributed my public key to hkp://pgp.mit.edu > <http://pgp.mit.edu>, use /–keyserver/ along with a key server > address, and use/–send-keys/ along with a keyid. You can get your > keyid by listing the public keys. Note that public keys are > synced among key servers. > > Now other people can import your public key from the key server to > their local machines: > > gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu> --recv-keys > C6EED57A > > > -- snap -- > > Anyway, its being used quite late in the process, when you > actually promote the release to Maven Central (after login into > oss.sonatype org and hit the "promote" button.). Are you on that > point already? > I agree this should have been written on the release wiki page. > > Toni > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Achim Nierbeck > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'm stuck at the release process for 1.0.0.M1 for PAX-WEB > right now. > The Release docu http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Releasing > states that > a gpg key should be uploaded. How do I get access to the > mentioned > www.ops4j.org <http://www.ops4j.org> server? > > The standard ops4j credentials can not be used. Is this a > result of the hack of > the ops4j machines? > > Please give me some sort of advice how I can go ahead and > release this version? > > Thanks, Achim > > >> Go for it: bring it on ;) >> Which list ? >> >> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Achim Nierbeck >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to propose a 1.0.0.M1 for PAX-WEB. >> Is there any issue open that really needs to be fixed >> before we can call >> it a 1.0? >> And secondly what do I need to do the release process. >> Right now only 4 persons are listed to be possible to >> release, is that >> correct? >> >> Feedback is welcome :) >> >> Greetings, Achim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Toni Menzel || **http://okidokiteam.com* >> > > > > > -- > *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com* > > > > > -- > *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
