thanks Richard - and congrats to your new family member btw! Not sure about the legal entity thing - but is eclipse (not eclipesource) a legal entity?? Ok, maybe the pretty non-formal participation mantra at ops4j conflicts with the TCK policies ? But then i really wonder - other than having an artificial money-making-cow - is it to keep the TCK under such restrictive constraints at all?
Will contact the alliance anyway - lets see what we can get. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Richard S. Hall <[email protected]>wrote: > On 1/19/11 13:13, Richard S. Hall wrote: > >> On 1/19/11 12:05, Toni Menzel wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Reading this [1] anyone know what we need to do to get access to the OSGi >>> TCK Set for OPS4J Projects ? >>> >>> [1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/rt-pmc/msg02203.html >>> >> >> Simplest way is to become a Felix committer, since we've had access for >> quite some time now... >> >> Not sure how many OSGi specs are implemented by OPS4J, but trying >> contacting OSGi and see what they say. >> > > I should add, the tricky part is that it requires a licensing agreement to > be signed and there is some expectation that the open source organization > has some level of control over agents acting on its behalf, since the CT > cannot be redistributed. > > At Apache, although not strictly required by the OSGi CT license, we ask > committers to sign an NDA. So, a purely "open" approach doesn't really work. > > -> richard > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
