Same for me, as long as it runs I'm fine. But I guess we do get a better longterm support for Jenkins :)
0.02€ from me :) Achim 2011/2/16 Toni Menzel <[email protected]>: > > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I honestly don't care. One that works fine would be good enough for me >> :-) >> >> If i had to choose, I wonder if Nexus would be a better choice given >> we all rely on maven and given the works Sonatype is putting in it. > > New Nexus CI ? > >> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:14, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Gang, >> > i know, the server is not yet ready for install but i would like to >> > start a >> > vote (informal) about what people would prefer when it comes to the CI >> > instance: >> > - Hudson >> > - Jenkins >> > Our CI Servers should deploy "somewhere". I would prefer a local Nexus >> > instance. (Just for CI Builds + Dependencies to non final 3party -say >> > ASF- >> > artifacts during development). >> > -- >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > general mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > -- > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
