Hi Tony, Is there any way you can email me the pax-runner and the pax-exam to me please?
Thanks Matt On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > ok, I'll give it a try --> this means (if everything works ok) I'm > going to release > > pax-scanner, pax-url, pax-runner, pax-exam > > within the next days > > kind regards, > andreas > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > > s/log/logic > > ;) > > > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> yes, thats correct. > >> It just adds (and registers) the new aether url handler. > >> Thats all. > >> In Pax URL MVN (the classic mvn: protocol) we try to delegate to > >> "aether:<bla>" (which works with the aforementioned commit). > >> If this is not available (unsupported protocol) then the old log is > being > >> used. > >> With this, you see, the real Pax Runner change is quite minimal. > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> mhm... Am I right assuming that pax-runner itself has no idea of > >>> aether and > >>> > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.runner/commit/4f88c4bf1a03a92810408a3dddf19e6ddcbe07d1 > >>> is the commit doing "all-the-work"? In this case, to test, I've to > >>> upgrade aether in pax-url and release pax-url too? (well, also a > >>> chance to finally get rid of the typo and the jdk14 stuff...) > >>> > >>> kind regards, > >>> andreas > >>> > >>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Yep, pax-runner is only required as middle layer between pax-scanner > >>> > and pax-exam > >>> > > >>> > I'll try if it works for my tests at least with a merged > >>> > > >>> > > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.runner/tree/feature-aether-support. > >>> > Let's see if it works :) > >>> > > >>> > kind regards, > >>> > Andreas > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> oopps.. not trunk yet. Its > >>> >> > >>> >> in > https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.runner/tree/feature-aether-support > >>> >> Well if you want the fast release, you go from trunk. Then i will > work > >>> >> on > >>> >> 1.7 with aether merged into. > >>> >> Alternatively you are free to merge that branch in and test + > release. > >>> >> But.. > >>> >> yeah i think pax runner was just a middle step for you, right ? (not > >>> >> your > >>> >> main concern) > >>> >> > >>> >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Andreas Pieber < > [email protected]> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> oh, ok, the current trunk runs fine for me :) But I've a limited > >>> >>> number of use cases... > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Would you like to upgrade or should I give it a view? > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I would be very thankful if some additional user could try the > latest > >>> >>> snapshots with their current environments to avoid breaking them. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Kind regards, > >>> >>> Andreas > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Toni Menzel < > [email protected]> > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> > Regarding Runner 1.6 and its aether support: It is meant to work > >>> >>> > already > >>> >>> > in > >>> >>> > trunk and should be included into the release. > >>> >>> > But: its been a while i worked on this, i think there are more > >>> >>> > recent > >>> >>> > aether > >>> >>> > versions we should use. > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Andreas Pieber > >>> >>> > <[email protected]> > >>> >>> > wrote: > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> Hey guys, > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> OK, TBH I have the problem that pax-scanner's scan-feature does > >>> >>> >> not > >>> >>> >> support version ranges like [x,y) by now. To fix this problem > I've > >>> >>> >> upgraded Pax-Scanner to use the latest Karaf version. But to get > >>> >>> >> this > >>> >>> >> fix into pax-exam I'll also have to release pax-runner and > >>> >>> >> pax-exam > >>> >>> >> besides pax-scanner. So there will be quite a bunch of releases > >>> >>> >> within > >>> >>> >> the next days :) In detail: > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> Pax-Scanner 1.1... > >>> >>> >> ---------------------------- > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> will include the following fixes > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-13 UNRESOLVED Use Apache Karaf instead of > >>> >>> >> ServiceMix > >>> >>> >> for > >>> >>> >> features scanner > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-17 FIXED Upgrade maven-bundle-plugin to 2.3.4 > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-19 FIXED Upgrade to pax-url 1.2.5 > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-20 FIXED Upgrade to swissbox 1.3.1 > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-18 FIXED upgrade pax-base to 1.2.2 > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-14 FIXED ConcurrentModificationException while > >>> >>> >> stopping > >>> >>> >> scanner service > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-11 FIXED Make an uber bundle > >>> >>> >> PAXSCANNER-12 FIXED Make Configuration Admin packages > >>> >>> >> optional > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> in addition I would like to remove the maven translator plugin > for > >>> >>> >> jdk1.4 if this is ok. This release is almost finished except for > a > >>> >>> >> little bit fine-tuning and the upgrade to karaf-2.2 components > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> Pax-Runner 1.6... > >>> >>> >> ------------------------ > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> will include the following fixes > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-350 UNRESOLVED Add support of start levels for > >>> >>> >> bundles > >>> >>> >> in > >>> >>> >> platform definition xml > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-370 UNRESOLVED Upgrade to pax-scanner 1.1.0 > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-261 UNRESOLVED Use multithreading to improve > >>> >>> >> performance > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-359 FIXED Support Felix 3.0.3 > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-360 FIXED Support gogo 0.6.1 and replace default > >>> >>> >> 0.6.0 > >>> >>> >> with this one > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-367 FIXED Use java.nio instead of java.io during > >>> >>> >> URL > >>> >>> >> download > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-354 FIXED in generated run.sh by executors > >>> >>> >> zip&script in > >>> >>> >> classpath properties ';' is used as delimiter instead of ':' > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-358 FIXED Error in batch files > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-368 FIXED Upgrade pax-url to 1.2.5 > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-369 FIXED upgrade swissbox to 1.3.1 > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-347 FIXED A "--noLogo" option for pax-runner > would > >>> >>> >> be > >>> >>> >> nice. > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-361 FIXED Broken Felix 3.0.2 link file > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-365 FIXED Support Apache Felix 3.0.4, 3.0.5, > 3.0.6 > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-363 FIXED Support Equinox 3.6.1 > >>> >>> >> PAXRUNNER-366 FIXED Support Knopflerfish 3.1.0 > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> Is it a problem to delay paxrunner-261 and 250 to 1.7 (since > both > >>> >>> >> are > >>> >>> >> "only" features? In addition: How do we want to handle ather in > >>> >>> >> this > >>> >>> >> release? Finally, I also want to remove the maven translator > >>> >>> >> plugin > >>> >>> >> for jdk1.4... WDYT? > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> Pax-Exam 1.2.4.... > >>> >>> >> ---------------------------- > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> will include the following fixes > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> PAXEXAM-200 UNRESOLVED Upgrade pax-runner to 1.6 > >>> >>> >> PAXEXAM-197 FIXED In RemoteBundleContextImpl class, the > >>> >>> >> bundle > >>> >>> >> can > >>> >>> >> be not installed and not found. The code raise a NPE. You must > >>> >>> >> wait > >>> >>> >> that the bundle is installed. > >>> >>> >> PAXEXAM-198 FIXED Upgrade maven-bundle-plugin to 2.3.4 > >>> >>> >> PAXEXAM-199 FIXED upgrade swissbox to 1.3.1 > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> Ok, all of my changes are available on github. Please feel free > to > >>> >>> >> review and all comments/problems and/or fixes you want to > include > >>> >>> >> within the next 3-6 days. I really want to get those versions > out > >>> >>> >> shortly after karaf-2.2. Any comments are highly welcomed :) > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> kind regards, > >>> >>> >> Andreas > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ > >>> >>> >> general mailing list > >>> >>> >> [email protected] > >>> >>> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > -- > >>> >>> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >>> >>> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >>> >> > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > > > > > > > > -- > > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
