*Niclas:
*
Great; thanks for letting us know;
I would not go with "the same PaxLogging API bundle."
for all the modularity of osgi - PaxLogging is not modular at all;
I would rather see it broken into more bundles with ability to
choose both
front end api and back end providers;
Thank you,
Andrei
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: paxlogging road map: logback?
From: Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]>
To: General OPS4J <[email protected]>
Date: Sat 21 May 2011 03:53:10 PM CDT
> Hi,
> I might actually work on this, as I have some logback requirement at
> work. Can't promise a timeline for it though.
>
> The most straight forward approach is to create an alternative
> implemention, i.e. have a separate bundle which uses the same Pax
> Logging API bundle. Shouldn't be too hard. Could also take opportunity
> to think through the Configuration side of things a bit more cleverly
> than was for the Log4j implementation.
>
> Are there any Jira issues posted already around this? I welcome
> feature requests...
>
> Cheers
> Niclas
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Andrei Pozolotin
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Guillaume, hello again;
>>
>> can you please let me know if logback is on paxlogging road map?
>>
>> like, making logging back-end pluggable, so it can be either log4j or
>> logback?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
