As I have not committed in this community before, I would appreciate a
review of these changes:

https://github.com/jadamcrain/org.ops4j.pax.logging

<https://github.com/jadamcrain/org.ops4j.pax.logging>They correspond to this
Jira:

https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXLOGGING-102

My hesitation with just merging this change was that I had to widen the
PaxLogger interface with overloads that take the FQCN so that I could tunnel
that info all the way to the log4j implementation.  Maybe this is OK, but I
don't like just adding methods to such a central interface without
discussion.

<https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXLOGGING-102>thanks for your time,
Adam
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to