I've created a new Pax Exam option frameworkProperty() and modified the
Native Container to support it (not yet tested and hence not committed).
For the Pax Runner container, this would also require a change in Pax
Runner, and I need some advice on that.
As far as I can see, the system properties (or at least the ones coming
from Exam options) are copied to the framework config file, which is not
really the best way, so I think Pax Runner should also get a new option
--frameworkProperty.
Pax Runner experts, what do you think?
Best regards,
Harald
Am 10.08.2011 05:04, schrieb Sanjeeb Sahoo:
Harald,
We are in complete agreement here. Filed an RFE to track it further:
http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-261
Thanks,
Sahoo
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Harald Wellmann <harald.wellm...@gmx.de
<mailto:harald.wellm...@gmx.de>> wrote:
I noticed the same with Equinox - Pax Exam currently has no option
for passing a property to the FrameworkFactory.newFramework(__Map)
method used by the native container.
I don't think the OSGi defines any explicit relation between this
property map and system properties.
AFAIK, it depends on the framework implementation whether or not a
system property has the same effect as config property in this Map.
For Equinox, it makes no difference (at least for the most common
properties), I don't know about Felix...
Any system properties defined in the Pax Exam @Configuration method by
systemProperty(key, value)
will be set when the framework is launched.
Example:
systemProperty("osgi.console", "6666")
Maybe that helps for Felix also?
Anyway, copying all system properties is probably not the best idea.
I think Pax Exam should really provide a new option
frameworkProperty(key, value)
to cover this case safely and in full generality.
Best regards,
Harald
Am 09.08.2011 21:24, schrieb Sanjeeb Sahoo:
I just ran across a situation where I had to configure a property
specific to Felix, but I could not do it. The code in Felix consults
only the configuration map passed to
FrameworkFactory.__createFramework,
but there is no way to configure this while using native test
container.
Should NativeTestContainer copy all the system property options
to the
config map in createFrameworkProperties method?
Thanks,
Sahoo
_________________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org <mailto:general@lists.ops4j.org>
http://lists.ops4j.org/__mailman/listinfo/general
<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
