On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Bram de Kruijff <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Toni,
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hey Bram,
>> i haven't used JUnit Rules myself yet, so yeah, maybe there is something
>> overwritten by the Exam Runner not recognizing the rules anymore. Feel free
>> to add an issue. Sorry.
>
> Will do, NP ;)

http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXEXAM-293

Regards,
Bram


>> About Jira Search: I just tried, indeed you are getting an odd error when
>> searching as a not-logged-in user. However, if you log in, searching works
>> as expected. We need to check the settings and/or consult Atlassian (who
>> host the instance) about that. (reminder to myself).
>
> Ok, thanks for the tip.
>
> Best,
> Bram
>
>> Toni
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Bram de Kruijff <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> are JUnit4 rules (supposed to be) supported in Pax Exam 2.x.y? I can't
>>> seem get it to work though I'm almost sure I used it before :S I've
>>> tried several configurations on 2.2.0 and 2.3.0.RC2-SNAPSHOT, but no
>>> luck so far. Below a simple test that runs fine in plain vanilla
>>> junit4, but fails with the PaxExam JUnit4TestRunner.
>>>
>>> @RunWith(JUnit4TestRunner.class)
>>> @ExamReactorStrategy(EagerSingleStagedReactorFactory.class)
>>> public class RuleTest {
>>>    @Rule
>>>    public TestName name = new TestName();
>>>    @Configuration
>>>    public Option[] config() {
>>>        JUnitBundlesOption option = new JUnitBundlesOption();
>>>        option.version("4.8.1");
>>>        return options(option);
>>>    }
>>>    @Test
>>>    public void doTest1() throws Exception {
>>>        Assert.assertNotNull("Expected a non null methodName at this
>>> point", name.getMethodName());
>>>        System.err.println("name : " + name.getMethodName());
>>>    }
>>> }
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Bram
>>>
>>> ps. The JIRA search is down saying "There was a communication problem."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Toni Menzel Source
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to