+1 from me, sounds like a good idea. Regards, Achim
2011/12/16 Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > not from my side... feel free to go ahead. > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 18:20, Harald Wellmann < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> As I've started working on a couple of things which should _not_ go into >> the forthcoming Pax Exam 2.3.0 release, I propose creating a pax-exam-2.3.x >> branch in the Github repo. >> >> The idea is that the 2.3.0 release and any subsequent 2.3.x releases will >> be taken from this branch, whereas all new stuff for 2.4+ will go to master. >> >> I.e. anybody reviewing or making changes for 2.3.0 would have to use the >> pax-exam-2.3.x branch. >> >> Any objections? >> >> Regards, >> Harald >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/**mailman/listinfo/general<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
