Thanks a lot for your reply Harald, I'm glad I didn't mess things up completely then. I guess we can live with "unknown" for this commit.
I thought I had to go via my GitHub account since that account is what is given permission to push to ops4j. Or did I misunderstood this - perhaps anyone can push to ops4j projects? /Bengt 2012/2/6 Harald Wellmann <[email protected]> > Hi Bengt, > > welcome to the wonderful world of Git... > > You're not alone, I'm still fighting with it after 9 months. For some > reason, Git's user-friendliness is inverse to its popularity, and I think > it's rather a shame that GitHub is GitHub and not MercurialHub. > > Anyway, the Pax Logging repo looks ok to me. The two commits are expected > when two people work in parallel: think of your commit as a temporary > branch which then had to be merged with someone else's changes in a second > commit. > > As Git allows you to forge history, there might be a way around that, but > I don't want to know ;-) > > You seem to be working with two GitHub repos, the official one and your > fork. I'm not sure which one is origin and which one is upstream. At any > rate, it's just unneeded complexity when you can directly push to the ops4j > repo. > > To set your username and email, use > > git config --global -e > > Most of the time, I use Git via Eclipse and EGit - I'm not too happy with > EGit either, compared to Subversive or MercurialEclipse, but it does help. > > Cheers, > Harald > > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/**mailman/listinfo/general<http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general> >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
