I agree, we might as well include _all_ OPS4J dependencies in the version info. That would mean adding OPS4J Base as well as Pax Swissbox.
Cheers, Harald Am 20. Februar 2012 11:51 schrieb Andreas Pieber <[email protected]>: > btw, I've patches for both of my requests ready. I just want to know what > you think about it before I push them. > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:42, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> I'm curious, is there any reason that you retrieve the pax-url version via >> the pax exam Info class, but not the base version? It would definitely help >> me in pax-exam-karaf (since I can deploy the version required by pax-exam >> automatically then). Are there any (logical) problems if I add it? >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
