+1! On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Harald, > > sounds good to me :) > > +1 > > regards, Achim > > 2012/6/25 Harald Wellmann <[email protected]>: > > A number of Pax Exam bugs have been fixed since 2.4.0, one of which > > was really located in Swissbox, so I'd like to roll maintenance > > releases Pax Exam 2.5.0 and Pax Swissbox 1.5.1 some time this week - > > check JIRA to see what's in the pipeline. > > > > Let me know if there are any objections. The version numbers are > negotiable ;-) > > > > Swissbox has a couple of fixes and a few additional APIs which don't > > break anything, so I think this doesn't call for 1.6.0. > > > > Pax Exam will be mainly a patch release, except for the fact that all > > obsolescent Pax-Runner-only options are now deprecated on master, so > > due to this API change (foreshadowing the peaceful death of Pax Runner > > Test Container in 3.0.0), I'm in favour of calling it 2.5.0 rather > > than 2.4.1. > > > > Best regards, > > Harald > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin > <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project > Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Toni Menzel | Founder | Rebaze GmbH [email protected] | www.rebaze.com
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
