Hi all, I have a rather nasty bug nagging me right now [1]. after digging around this I realized we still have a dependency for a 1.0-beta-7 used in pax-url. The latest version available is 2.2 So my proposal is to change to the latest stable version 2.2. in the mere hope that secured passwords are also usable with the http-lightweight wagon. If it turns out that this is still not possible I would try to switch to the wagon-http (obviously not so lightweight :( )
Are there any objections to this? Does anyone know a good reason to not use the http wagon? thanks and regards, Achim [1] - http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXURL-197 -- Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
