Open a ticket for the change request. To maintain backward compatibility with existing installations i would propse a new swissbox-bnd bundle that embeds aqute (+exports). wdyt? We could also provide a "all in one" paxurl wrap version.
Toni -- Toni Menzel | Founder | Rebaze GmbH [email protected] | www.rebaze.com Access To Alien Technology: Great software needs a great foundation. We help unlocking the next level in technology. Rebaze Pass for Maven <http://goo.gl/1YLlt>, Rebaze Pass for OSGi<http://goo.gl/WP8XT> , Rebaze Pass for Neo4j <http://www.rebaze.com/services/>, Rebaze Pass for Jenkins <http://www.rebaze.com/services/> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]>wrote: > In apache karaf we are using pax-url-wrap for quite a while now. In > version 1.5.0 I noticed that pax-url-wrap depends on pax-swissbox-bnd. > The last brings inside some dependencies that I consider unnecessary like > aQute bnd tool and junit bundle. > > I'd think that aQute classes could be part of pax-swissbox-bnd using the > private package. This way we could also avoid the junit imports of aQute. > > Do you see any reason for having aQute bnd tool as bundle in order to > use pax-swissbox-bnd? > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Twitter: iocanel > * > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
