also: karaf sort of solves this problem via karaf-features-plugin, right? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: pax exam config duplication From: Harald Wellmann <hwellmann...@gmail.com> To: General OPS4J <general@lists.ops4j.org> Date: Fri 28 Sep 2012 11:10:03 AM CDT > This is an FAQ, and if it were easy, I guess we'd have implemented a > solution already ;-) > > You have to worry about transitive dependencies, API bundles vs. > implementation bundles (like org.osgi.core vs. > org.apache.felix.framework) and lots of other things. For every > scenario or proposal I've seen so far, it is easy to construct > counterexamples where the suggested approach would not work. > > I'm not saying it can't be done at all, but my feeling is it would be > a lot of effort to catch all sorts of weird cases, and I don't think > it would pay off. > > Another benefit of listing provisioned bundles explicitly is working > with different configurations in different tests of the same Maven > project, which would not be possible if the configuration were derived > from the POM. > > Best regards, > Harald > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
