I think this is a bug report.
I have looked into the build.conf file.
The prebuilt's rpm is too old. The latest tizen-base actually is the
"Base". But the problem is the util-linux file being included in the
lastest base, which DOESN't have the "su" do command. I have to check with
the prebuilt version 2.24. devel repo version 2.25 and latest 2.28. Only
latest doesn't have "su" command. I think I have to revert back to old base
repo.
[marship@localhost t]$ rpm -qlp ../util-linux-2.24.2-7.5.x86_64.rpm |grep su
/etc/default/su
/etc/pam.d/su
/etc/pam.d/su-l
/usr/bin/su
/usr/sbin/sulogin
[marship@localhost t]$ rpm -qlp util-linux-2.25.2-2.4.x86_64.rpm |grep su
/etc/default/su
/etc/pam.d/su
/etc/pam.d/su-l
/usr/bin/su
/usr/sbin/sulogin
[marship@localhost t]$ rpm -qlp util-linux-2.28-8.1.x86_64.rpm |grep su
/etc/pam.d/su
/etc/pam.d/su-l
/usr/sbin/sulogin


On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Scott Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear pawel.
>    I have added the base+common into the local repo. Now more packages
> built, but the same problem with there are OLD packages in
> prebuilt/toolchains-x86_64 which existing within base repo too. Looks base
> contains higher version and -devel files. Then for some package, the lower
> version of package were installed and conflicts reported. Usually I will
> remove the conflicts packages from prebuilt/ and createrepo . to rebuild
> the repbuilt directory. But now, some package reports gcc/libdw conflicts
> so I have to remove gcc from prebuilt.
>    My question is what exactlly "prebuilt/toolchains-x86_64"  are? An
> older version of Base repo without -devel packages? How can I make it to
> newer version?
>    Thanks.
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Paweł Wieczorek <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> I am glad I could help.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Paweł Wieczorek
>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>> Samsung [email protected]
>>
>> On 28/10/16 18:02, Scott Zhang wrote:
>>
>> You win Pawel.
>> The base repo still have packages devel repo doesn't have so I am
>> including the repo in now.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Scott Zhang <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank. Pawel.
>>> Yes. I guess missing "Base" is a main cause.
>>> During the daytime dig of all urls, I found
>>> http://download.tizen.org/snapshots/devel/common/latest/rep
>>> os/x86_64-wayland/packages/ , Looks the "Devel" contains all the rpm
>>> build need, so I am making a little more progress today, few more packages
>>> build success. Due to the slow network speed of China, I am getting slow
>>> with remote repository. I will revert back to Base+Common if devel fails.
>>>
>>> Thank again.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Paweł Wieczorek <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>>
>>>> The issues you reported here and in "About Repo Sync get..." thread
>>>> seem to be caused by the Tizen:Base repository (or rather by the lack of
>>>> it).
>>>>
>>>> In order to get all the necessary source code, please refer to the
>>>> following thread:
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/2016-June/007100.html
>>>>
>>>> Description of setting up proper GBS configuration can be found in
>>>> following threads:
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/007045.html
>>>> https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/2016-June/007101.html
>>>> https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/2016-September/007159.html
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paweł Wieczorek
>>>> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>>>> Samsung [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> On 27/10/16 08:03, Scott Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have read the link over 10 times and tried to understand and
>>>> following each command. but still can't get project build without problem.
>>>> Now I hangs on
>>>> tpk-backend:
>>>>   nothing provides libgdbm.so.3()(64bit) needed by capi-system-info
>>>>
>>>> So many missings.
>>>>
>>>> I am using Centos7 to build tizen_common x86_64-wayland. Any
>>>> suggestions?
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> https://source.tizen.org/documentation/developer-guide/getti
>>>> ng-started-guide/building-packages-locally-gbs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> General mailing 
>>>> [email protected]https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>>
>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general

Reply via email to