IMO Javascript was a much better strategic choice than Java. The people who need to be aware of Lively are the same people who made jQuery succeed.
I love the way Google has documented their Javascript APIs. I think this approach would help. Very few people will want to build entire "sites" on Lively but parts of it should be widely adopted. Did someone mention a debugger? Keep up the good work :-) Cheers, Steve On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Peter Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: > Short version: > > IMO, the *Java* version of Lively is the fast route to a universal, > fast, tight platform. Such a platform is a prerequisite for an active > community. _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://livelykernel.sunlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/general
