On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm OK with this, but I'm not sure if infra is OK with that structure. Based > on that I think what we want to request is the following be added to the > rules. > > /x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/logging: %(DIST)s/release/logging > > /x1/www/logging.apache.org: %(ASF)s/logging/site/main > /x1/www/logging.apache.org/log4j: %(ASF)s/logging/site/log4j > /x1/www/logging.apache.org/log4j2: %(ASF)s/logging/site/log4j2 > /x1/www/logging.apache.org/log4php: %(ASF)s/logging/site/log4php > /x1/www/logging.apache.org/log4cxx: %(ASF)s/logging/site/log4cxx > /x1/www/logging.apache.org/log4net: %(ASF)s/logging/site/log4net
great, didn't know it is possible. > chainsaw and log4j companions also show up on the main site. Do we also want > those? I think so. Imho we should start treat Chainsaw more as a product on its own. Companions is small but we should treat it the same way. That would ease things I think. But thats just my 2 cents. Cheers Christian > > Ralph > > On Apr 16, 2012, at 12:37 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I'm actually more concerned with us having to use svnpubsub >>> (see http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html). The maven team created a >>> plugin - http://maven.apache.org/sandbox/plugins/asf-svnpubsub-plugin/ to >>> aid in this but I haven't tired it. I also understand that it requires the >>> main website to have something done to it first. >> >> didn't know about the mvn plug - thanks! >> >>> Log4j2 uses the Maven site plugin so I guess I really need to know is what >>> the location of the svn directory would be to pass to svnpubsub:prepare. >> >> What about: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/pubsub/$project >> >> For example: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/pubsub/log4j2 >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/pubsub/log4php >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/pubsub/main (start site) >> >> and so on >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> >>> On Apr 16, 2012, at 12:14 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Do we have a process in place for updating the web site? I'm trying to go >>> through any issues that might exist with doing a release of Log4j2 and this >>> is one of them. >>> >>> >>> I am not aware of a specific process (old timers might want to correct me). >>> So far I know we have updated the website whenever the release has >>> been published. I am not a huge fan of restricting website updates to >>> releases and think we should be able to update at any time we want. >>> >>> This again touches the question with pubsub. We need to make a >>> decision if we move to mvn site:deploy or do something else. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> https://www.timeandbill.de >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
