On 2012-06-12, Ralph Goers wrote: > On Jun 11, 2012, at 9:19 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> OK, if this is holding up the release then I'll simply tar up the >> existing site and add it to svn - I can figure out a better way to do >> it later. > Yes, that is an option. However, I think it is important that we all > get a feel for how this works. The site building process in log4net is too brittle anyway, it involves creating API docs which I currently don't manage to do at all. Fixing that is so far down on my TODO list that it would have delayed the log4j release for an unaceptable time. Stefan
