On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am in favor of this and frankly wish it was ASF policy. IMO doing this 
> annually is good for the project and and should make the existing chair feel 
> like it isn't happening because people are unhappy with them.  If we do this 
> I would suggest adding it to the Logging project guidelines page  with a 
> fixed date.

+1

I propose the week after the annual members meeting for the election
date. It is easy to remember imho


>
> Ralph
>
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:57 PM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I recently thought about the role of the Chair in an ASF project.
>>
>> Basically the Chair is the connection between project and the team. In
>> well working projects it means the chair writes reports and has
>> basically little to do. Still it seems that the chair gets some extra
>> attention when it is about decision making and performing new ideas. I
>> recently could observe this at the Apache Incubator. The Incubator has
>> (had) some problems and there were heated discussion how to solve it.
>> Finally Jukka Zitting arrived and somehow everybody trusted him
>> immediately. Jukka was elected as a chair and started to change things
>> in the Incubator. I must say he really does a great job and the
>> Incubator has become a better place now.
>>
>> One could say, Jukka could have done this job as PMC and there is no
>> need to be chair. But in fact, I feel this is wrong and just gray
>> theory. I am pretty sure electing him as a chair was a wise decision
>> and gave him the chance to influence the project more.
>>
>> That being said I think we need to do an annual election for this chair role.
>>
>> If there are no other chair volunteers, the election is easy: just
>> confirm the current chair. If others want to take this role, let's
>> elect.
>>
>> Why should one become a chair?
>>
>> I guess, sometimes it is just interesting and exciting to look more
>> into the details of the ASF. I am not sure what my reasons are
>> exactly, but it's some combination of interest and fun. And I like
>> this community and want to help.
>>
>> With an annual election we would have the chance to get a yearly fresh
>> breath into this project. In addition, the weight of this role is not
>> so heavy as with an unlimited period.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Christian



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

Reply via email to