I don't see chainsaw, log4php or log4net in https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/loggingtest/content/
Ralph On Jul 7, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> The pages you were adding were disappearing because the root directories >>> (log4cxx, chainsaw, etc) were not exposed in extpaths.txt. I have updated >>> that file but once again it appears that the content for log4php and >>> chainsaw are gone. If you commit them again they should stay put now. >> > > Actually it worked out already. Just republished the site and nothing > bad happened. > > Cheers > >> >> Oh dear. Thank you. I have only read the comment as you were >> committing that change. >> Well... will try to commit that again. >> >> >>> Ralph >>> >>> On Jul 7, 2012, at 4:49 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> i just committed the log4cxx pages (once again - for some reason the >>>> CMS is deleting it for me from time to time!), the chainsaw pages and >>>> the log4php pages. >>>> >>>> For chainsaw I just took the content of the old site directory. Then I >>>> moved the binaries from log4j/webstart to chainsaw/webstart. Now the >>>> webstart files reside in the Chainsaw folder. Afterwards I committed, >>>> and everything is up. BUT if you try to download these binaries >>>> through the website they are not found. Anybody got an idea why? >>>> >>>> I need to do some other work now, so I am glad bout everybody who can test >>>> it. >>>> >>>> That being said, I am +0 with moving on now and replace the websites. >>>> +0 only because the chainsaw downloads bug me. Maybe Scott has an idea >>>> because he already dealt with things like that. >>>> >>>> Here is the repos in question: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/loggingtest/content/chainsaw/ >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> OK, but I'm consistently seeing users on the Logback list mentioning how >>>>> they are switching from Log4j. Presumably, if they see that there is an >>>>> upgrade available here they might give it a try. >>>>> >>>>> That said, I guess I might as well go ahead with the release process and >>>>> publish it to loggingtest. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 8:00 AM, Ivan Habunek wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I also haven't done my bit for log4php yet. Not much free time. Should >>>>>> have it done this weekend. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Ivan >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5 July 2012 16:57, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> On 2012-07-05, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any update on this? Can we replace logging.apache.org with what is at >>>>>>>> loggingtest.apache.org? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Haven't found time to make the final adjustments for log4net, but TBH >>>>>>> I'll be more likely to find the time if there is a pressing need >>>>>>> (complaining users) - so no reason to wait for me/log4net. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stefan >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>>> https://www.timeandbill.de >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> https://www.timeandbill.de > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > https://www.timeandbill.de
